On theories, symmetries, and gauge

 I’m excited to share my latest expository work, titled On theories, symmetries, and gauge, now available on Researchgate! In this
work, I provide a foundational exploration of the mathematical definition of physical theories, transformations, and symmetries. 

 

I welcome feedback and discussions—feel free to reach out! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

About the definition of angle, from Geometric Algebra

Image
In GA, bivectors represent  2-dimensional directions. Any simple bivector can be written as \[ \theta e_1e_2 \] with \(\theta \in \mathbb{R}\) and \(\{e_i\}\) unitary and orthogonal vectors. The unitary vectors specify the 2- direction itself, and \(\theta\) is the size (analogous to the length of a vector, that is a 1-dimensional direction). Given two vectors \(a\) and \(b\) (that we take to be unitary, wlog) we say that the simple bivector \(\theta e_1e_2\) is the angle formed by them if \[ ab=e^{\theta e_1 e_2} \] where we take as a definition \[ e^A=1+A+A^2 /2+\cdots=\lim_N (1+\frac{A}{N})^N \] Real analysis let us assure that this expression is well defined when \(A\) is a 2-blade. In fact, since \(e_1e_2e_1e_2=-1\), we can write \[ e^{\theta e_1 e_2}=cos(\theta)+e_1 e_2sin(\theta) \] where \(cos\) and \(sin\) are defined by their power series. Oserve that \(b=a e^{\theta e_1 e_2}\) and then \[ b=a(cos(\theta)+e_1 e_2sin(\theta))=a\cdot cos(\theta)+ ae_1e_2 \cdot sin(\theta...
Read more

Spherical, hyperbolic and parabolic geometry

Image
Let's consider the space \(\mathbb{M}^4\), that is, the manifold \(\mathbb{R}^4\) with coordinates \((x,y,z,t)\) but with the pseudo-Riemannian metric given in each tangent space by \[ ds^2=dx^2+dy^2+dz^2-dt^2. \] This metric is left invariant by the group \(O(3,1)\) when acting on \(\mathbb{M}^4\). It also leaves invariant the cone \[ t^2-x^2-y^2-z^2=0 \] so is logical that we pay attention to it. Now, following TRTR from Penrose page 423, we can consider the family of hyperplanes inside \(\mathbb{M}^4\) given by \[ z+t+\lambda(t-z)=2 \] intersecting our cone in different 2-dimensional submanifolds \(P_{\lambda}\) of \(\mathbb{M}^4\). Here we have a picture from that book, where we consider only \((x,z,t)\) for purposes of drawability. If we analyse the case \(\lambda=0\), we observe that we obtain the submanifold \(P_0\), \(E\) in the picture with a shape of a parabola, given by the embedding \begin{align*}   \phi \colon \mathbb{R}^2 &\longrightarrow \mathbb{M}^4\\   (u_...
Read more

Charge density and current density

Image
Electromagnetic effects happen by the existence of moving particles with charge. We can imagine that we have infinite charged particles, and their movement being described by infinite curves. But this is not the optimal way to think of them. First of all, recall that when we study a really large number of mass particles in classical mechanics is better to pass to continuum mechanics. This way, we substitute a huge number of positions by a distribution of mass density (a 3-form, if we are in 3D space). We "count" how many particles are in a infinitesimal cube centred at \((x,y,z)\) and construct the differential form \[ \omega=\rho(x,y,z)dxdydz \] that let us recover the mass which is enclosed by a volume \(V\) by means of \[ \int_V \rho(x,y,z)dxdydz \] In what follows, we will work with two spatial dimensions, to get clearer pictures. So we have a mass density \[ \omega=\rho(x,y,t)dxdy \] (observe we have made our density depends on time, by the way). But this is not the whol...
Read more