Spherical, hyperbolic and parabolic geometry
Let's consider the space M4, that is, the manifold R4 with coordinates (x,y,z,t) but with the pseudo-Riemannian metric given in each tangent space by
ds2=dx2+dy2+dz2−dt2.
This metric is left invariant by the group O(3,1) when acting on M4. It also leaves invariant the cone
t2−x2−y2−z2=0
so is logical that we pay attention to it.
Now, following TRTR from Penrose page 423, we can consider the family of hyperplanes inside M4 given by
z+t+λ(t−z)=2
intersecting our cone in different 2-dimensional submanifolds Pλ of M4.
Here we have a picture from that book, where we consider only (x,z,t) for purposes of drawability.
If we analyse the case λ=0, we observe that we obtain the submanifold P0, E in the picture with a shape of a parabola, given by the embedding
ϕ:R2⟶M4(u1,u2)↦(u1,u2,1−u21+u224,1+u21+u224)
We can look for the (possibly pseudo) metric inherited by P0. Since
dϕ=(1001−u12−u22u12u22)
we conclude that P0 consists of R2 with the euclidean metric:
g=(1001)
That is, although we see it like a parabola, intrinsically is only the Euclidean plane, and that is the reason the latter is sometimes called parabolic geometry.
But, what happens for others λ? Let's see. We have a far more complicated parametrization of our embedded manifold:
ϕ(u1,u2)=(u1,u2,−1+λ+√−(1+λ)2(−1+λ(u21+u22))2λ,
2+λ+√−(1+λ)2(−1+λ(u21+u22))+1−√−(1+λ)2(−1+λ(u21+u22))λ2(1+λ))
(computations made with Mathematica).
If we compute the (possibly pseudo) metric in this chart we obtain the inherited metric in R2
gλ=(1−λu221−λ(u21+u22)λu1u21−λ(u21+u22)λu1u21−λ(u21+u22)1−λu211−λ(u21+u22))
Next step is to show that for λ>0 we have an isometry into the usual sphere, and that for λ<0 we have an isometry into the hyperbolic space. This would justify the terms elliptic and hyperbolic for those geometries, as you can see at the picture above (S and H respectively). In order to keep it simple we can work with λ=1 and λ=−1.
For λ=1, we have
g=(1−u221−(u21+u22)u1u21−(u21+u22)u1u21−(u21+u22)1−u211−(u21+u22))
But if we look at a typical chart of the usual sphere in E3
ψ:(x,y)⟼(x,y,√1−x2−y2)
and compute the metric we obtain just
g=(1−y21−(x2+y2)xy1−(x2+y2)xy1−(x2+y2)1−x21−(x2+y2))
so they are the same.
And for λ=−1 we have
g=(1+u221+u21+u22−u1u21+u21+u22−u1u21+u21+u221+u211+u21+u22)
But if we look at the typical model for hyperbolic plane that consists of the pseudosphere embedded in M3:
x2+y2−z2=−1
with a chart given by
ψ:(x,y)⟼(x,y,√1+x2+y2)
we obtain the inherited metric in R2 (keep an eye: inherited from the Minkowski metric, not the Euclidean one):
g=(1+y21+x2+y2−xy1+x2+y2−xy1+x2+y21+x21+x2+y2)
so we are done.
Comments
Post a Comment